DPP blasts cybercrime legislative blockers
Neville Graham, Business Reporter
Director of Public Prosecutions, Paula Llewellyn, has blasted some attorneys in Parliament who she says are standing in the way of legislative changes urgently needed to prosecute cybercrimes.
She says the present laws are out of date and are not in keeping with present realities given the difficulty in securing convictions.
"In order to prove a case, the prosecutor has to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt ... and we can only prove the case if we present evidence that is available, cogent, reliable and admissible," the DPP said as she addressed the third annual anti-money laundering conference at the Knutsford Court Hotel, New Kingston, today.
Llewellyn said new laws needed to fight criminal activity through computer-generated evidence were being taken though the legislative process by Justice Minister Mark Golding but has met with stiff resistance from those who may have a vested interest.
"It is not having an easy passage in Parliament because clearly, on both sides of the house ... upper and lower house, you have my worthy members of the defence bar who unfortunately, I believe, may or may not be undergoing, not an attack of chik V but something almost as dangerous. Itís called myopia," the DPP said.
She outlined the difficulty in using computer-generated evidence in that prosecutors are required to prove that the computer from which it was collected was working at the time when the crime was committed. She called for a change in the law that would make it easier to secure convictions, noting that other countries have gone far ahead of Jamaica.
"In most other countries and also (elsewhere) in the Caribbean, amendments have been done years ago where it is a presumption that the computer is in good working order and if the defence is saying otherwise then the evidential burden shifts to them to prove that the computer was not," Llewellyn said.
She called on auditors and compliance officers in financial institutions to be advocates in the cause to get legislators on board to pass laws that will help in the fight against money laundering and terrorism financing.
The DPP was not definitive in the overall effect of the outdated laws but insisted that anecdotal evidence indicates that it is proving to be a major burden on financial investigations and an impediment to securing convictions.