| Listen to Live Jamaican Radio, Listen to Power 106 FM 24x7. Click Here to Listen Free | (Advertisement) |
![]() |
|
BusinessTaiwan company fined $500 million for LCD price fixing2012-09-20 16:34:11 | (0 Comments) ![]() The conspiracy affected every family, school, business, charity and government agency around the world that paid more to purchase notebook computers, computer monitors, and LCD televisions. The sentences handed down Thursday are among the harshest penalties ever given in an antitrust criminal case. Still, the U.S. Department of Justice complained the punishments were not enough. Federal prosecutors demanded a $1 billion fine and a 10-year prison sentence for the executives. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said she rejected the demand because A.U. Optronics has already paid out millions to settle a class-action lawsuit and still faced other lawsuits in the United States and around the world. She also said the two executives — Hsuan Bin Chen and Hui Hsiung — didn't deserve the lengthy prison sentences demanded by prosecutors because they acted not for personal gain like someone operating a Ponzi scheme but out of their sincere belief that they were aiding a troubled industry plagued by over-production and plummeting prices. Both men declined to address the court. "There were a lot of business pressures they responded to," the judge said. "There was relatively little personal motivation." Nonetheless, the judge said the evidence of their guilt was "overwhelming" and that "they did know it was illegal." The company and seven other competitors who have previously pleaded guilty were convicted of sending executives to quarterly meetings between 2001 and 2006 to hash out production levels and prices they would charge the world's largest technology companies for their liquid display screens. The tech giants include companies such as Apple Inc., Dell Computers and a long-list of television and computer makers. Many of the meetings' agendas and conclusions were documented and presented to the jury as evidence. The jury convicted the company and men in March. Prosecutors said the conspiracy artificially inflated the cost of those products for consumers around the world. One-third of the $74 billion in LCD screen sales implicated in the scheme were made by U.S. companies. "These defendants played a pivotal role in a global conspiracy that had an unprecedented impact on the pocket books of American consumers," said federal prosecutor Heather Tewksbury, who unsuccessfully argued for harsher sentences. "They have done nothing to accept any responsibility for what they did." The judge is allowing the company to pays its fine in four instalments over the next year after its attorney Dennis Riordan pleaded for a payment plan. He said the company had only $80 million in cash on hand and order to pay the fine immediately would cause lenders to demand repayment of $6.5 billion worth of loans. Such a scenario would have "killed" the company, Riordan said. The judge also ordered the company to publish in three "trade journals" that it has been convicted of price fixing and what measures it’s taking to avoid breaking the law in the future. The Department of Justice is wrapping up a years-long investigation of the global price-fixing scheme that artificially increased the price of LCD screens used in televisions, computers and other electronic products made by Apple Inc., Dell Computers and many of the largest high-tech companies in the United States. "The conspiracy affected every family, school, business, charity, and government agency that paid more to purchase notebook computers, computer monitors, and LCD televisions during the conspiracy," prosecutors concluded in arguing for the criminal penalties. AU Optronics and the other co-conspirators are also the targets of class action lawsuits filed by customers, retailers and consumers. Chen and Hsiung were allowed to go free and ordered to report to prison on December 20. AP Source: The Gleaner/Power 106 News Send your images, videos and updates to youreport@gleanerjm.com | Click here to Comment Your Comments
The opinions on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent.
To respond to The Gleaner please use the feedback form.
Video |
|
Go- Jamaica: Home | Business Directory | Jobsmart | Chat | Gallery | Videos | Events Disclaimer | Privacy Policy |Contact Us | Terms of Service |