REDACTED 2 - IC Petrojam Investigation - Recruitment and Parties October 18, 2019 final

Page 110 of 486 Petrojam Limited Integrity Commission October 2019 … Q: Could you look at the analysis that you gave? A: I already did. Q: I want you to now read it; Analysis of Applicant's Appraisal, Item #1. Could you read what your comment was. A: Knowledge and experience in the role was excellent. Q: Could you read the one that you gave for #2. A: Gave too much information unsolicited by panel. Q: and in Item #3, what was your rating and what did you understand that the ratings were to mean; meaning one to five, is one the highest or the lowest and five the highest? A: Five in my estimation was the highest based on what was at the top of the page. Q: Was that explained to you in the preliminaries as to what the rating meant? A: Well, I think it was self-explanatory. I don't recall us being told what the rating meant, but based on the ratings at the top, and if you look at the form it is in the same format so I just... Q: Took a position? A: Yes. I would have assumed that four would have