REDACTED 2 - IC Petrojam Investigation - Recruitment and Parties October 18, 2019 final

Page 165 of 486 Petrojam Limited Integrity Commission October 2019 On the Arithmetic Test administered on April 10, 2017, a score was not affixed for Mr. Clayton Smith. However, based upon the DI’s calculation, Mr. Smith received a score of 67 out of 90, which is equivalent to a score of approximately 74%. 3. English Comprehension test administered on March 29, 2017 On the English Comprehension test administered on March 29, 2017, Mr. Clayton Smith received a score of 8 out of 50, which is equivalent to a score of 16%. 4. English Comprehension test administered on April 10, 2017 On the English Comprehension test administered on April 10, 2017, Mr. Clayton Smith received a score of 9 out of 50, which is equivalent to a score of 18%. 5. Mental Ability Test #1 On an undated Mental Ability test administered to Mr. Clayton Smith, he received a score of 40 out of 60, which is equivalent to a score of approximately 67%. 6. Mental Ability Test #2 On an undated Mental Ability test administered to Mr. Clayton Smith, he received a score of 49 out of 60, which is equivalent to a score of approximately 82%. 7. Mechanical Comprehension Test On an undated Mechanical Comprehension test administered to Mr. Clayton Smith, he received a score of 32 out of 60, which is equivalent to a score of approximately 53%.