REDACTED 2 - IC Petrojam Investigation - Recruitment and Parties October 18, 2019 final

Page 30 of 486 Petrojam Limited Integrity Commission October 2019 JURISDICTION The jurisdiction of the Integrity Commission (IC) to investigate allegations concerning acts of impropriety and/or irregularity, conflict of interest, corruption, nepotism, cronyism and favouritism at Petrojam Limited is grounded in Sections 6 (1) (a), 33 (1) (a) and (b), 52 (1) (a) of the Integrity Commission Act (ICA) and Section 2, 14 and 15 of the Corruption Prevention Act. The DI, in the conduct of the Investigation, relied upon Sections 4 and 8 of the Perjury Act, Sections 3 (1) and (2) and 5 (3) (j) of the Forgery Act, Section 16 of the Financial Administration and Audit Act and Section 17 and 25 of Public Bodies Management and Accountability Act in determining prima facie evidence of criminal culpability and/or administrative breaches. The DI has attached at Appendix 7, extracts of the referenced legislation.