Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  135 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 135 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

134

6.50.

The barricades and embattlements, the early warning

system and the presence of a large number of gunmen together

provided a formidable defence mechanism that presented serious risks

to residents and the security forces alike.

6.51.

The heavy gunfire aimed at the security forces had some

negative effects on the operation. It slowed the movement of the

security forces and delayed their entry into Tivoli Gardens. We accept

that it took approximately 30 minutes for the soldiers under the

command of Lt. Col. Sewell to make their way north along Industrial

Terrace to its intersection with McKenzie Drive. Such a journey would

normally take 5 minutes. As a result of the intensity of the gunfire, the

unit led by Lt. Col. Sewell entered sector 1 inside Tivoli Gardens about

noon, having left the UDC car park at 11.30 a.m.

6.52.

We accept as credible the evidence of CoP Ellington and

other senior police officers that the barricades and embattlements

were of a quality and quantity that precluded their safe removal by the

JCF. Indeed, on 23 May, owing to the blockading of roads and shooting

by gunmen, a police rescue operation led by ACP Rose had to be

aborted. As a result, they were at first, unable to rescue colleagues at

the Darling Street Police Station.

6.53.

We also find that the sustained and coordinated violent

efforts of the gunmen so restricted the progress of the security forces

that the process of pacification of the designated sectors within Tivoli

Gardens was significantly delayed. It was not until about 3.00 p.m.

that sectors 1 and 2 were dominated while sector 3 was not controlled

until approximately 5.00 p.m. although the JCF did not enter this sector

until daybreak on 25 May. In our opinion, the time taken to dominate