Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  168 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 168 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

167

FINDINGS

7.105.

The house clearing exercises were heavy-handed. We

accept the evidence of many residents who testified of being roughly

treated by the security forces during the searches. We find that

several dwellings were not only ransacked but were severely damaged

by the indiscriminate use of excessive force. Bullet holes within the

interior of dwellings, tiles ripped up and appliances damaged appeared

to have been evidence of unnecessary and inappropriate discharge of

duties. Although we appreciate that a search in a relatively “hot zone”,

in the context of an unprecedented confrontation, would not be a

“Sunday School exercise”, we are not satisfied that the extent of

damage reported and seen by us in some video clips was justified.

7.106.

We repeat our findings at Chapter 5 para.5.81.

7.107.

The forced detentions were wholly disproportionate to the

requirements of the situation. The impression left with us is that

young males were taken arbitrarily and subjected to indignities within

Tivoli Gardens before being herded, onto trucks and taken away to

detention centres. The fact that over 4,000 persons were detained but

only 148 not released, is powerful evidence from which an inference

can reasonably be drawn that the large-scale detentions were

arbitrary.

7.108.

CDS Saunders admitted that he received allegations of

abuse by soldiers but he insisted “I have no evidence of abuse”.

CoP Ellington said that he “could not rule out the possibility of

policemen misconducting themselves”. We find that the security

forces did not respect the property of many residents while carrying

out house clearing and searches. We have set forth our reasons for