Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  19 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

18

the contributors and editors, Professor Anthony Harriott, a member of this

Commission, writes at p.214:

“The Presidential Click is not a typical criminal group, but

rather a high intensity and

high impact

case. It is one of the

most powerful, oldest and most resilient criminal groups in

Jamaica, and even has links to national power circuits via its

alliance to one of the nation’s major political parties. The

Click is further connected with global criminal networks that

enable the exploitation of illegal activities beyond Jamaica’s

borders. While the group has both licit and illicit sources of

income, at its core, their wide range of illegal activities

demonstrates

their

tendency

towards

violent

entrepreneurialism. The Presidential Click has an exceptional

relationship with the host community that it is deeply

embedded in. The nature of this relationship consists of

high levels of cohesion, stable leadership and, for the most

part, uncontested leadership transitions. Most of all, the

Presidential Click is known for its use of violence as a

disciplinary tool in the maintenance and replication of the

Garrison phenomenon, its violent conflicts with other groups

and with law enforcement, and the exploitation of its

reputation for violence to extract protection fees and various

forms of tribute and rent from its victims including other

criminals. Many regard this Jamaican organised crime group

as one that most closely approximates what Anton Blok

(1974) describes as mafia.”

2.13.

DCP Hinds said that Coke’s leadership was unchallenged and he

described Coke’s position in the Tivoli Gardens community in this way:

“He operated a surrogate government. He operated his own

court and persons who breached his code were brought to

him, tried and sentenced.”

2.14.

Former Commissioner of Police, Owen Ellington, described Tivoli

Gardens under Coke’s suzerainty as “a state within the State”. Evidence before

the Commission revealed that utility companies such as those providing

electricity, water and telephones were unable to go into Tivoli Gardens to collect

outstanding monies due to them. In fact, for very many years, residents of Tivoli