Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  211 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 211 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

210

together with the relevant cheque numbers (telephone numbers redacted). At

Appendix 9 is a copy of a document summarising and detailing the grants made

to vendors in Coronation Market. At Appendix 10 is a copy of the list of persons

to whom funeral grants were paid to the respective Funeral Homes. At Appendix

11 is a copy of information specific to dwellings totally destroyed. It is

noteworthy that the majority of these dwellings were in the area of #1 McKenzie

Drive. At Appendix 12 is a copy of the questionnaires (MoLSS Application for

Rehabilitation/Compassionate Emergency Relief) used by officers assigned by the

MoLSS.

FINDINGS

8.150.

We had no difficulty accepting the evidence of Permanent

Secretary, Mrs. Roberts-Risden. It was clear, concise and thoroughly

credible. Accordingly, we find that the payments made to residents of

West Kingston were not “compensation” properly so called as that

term is used, for example, in the law of torts and, in particular,

damages for loss and damage to property. The payments were

compassionate grants made to assist residents in achieving minimum

reparation for damage to their properties or re-establishing their

businesses in Coronation Market. The payments were contributions

rather than full compensation. They were made without consideration

of liability and were, therefore,

ex gratia

payments. Moreover, the

Government had capped amounts which residents would receive for

particular categories of damage. To that extent, the caps were not

intended to compensate fully.

8.151.

The MoLSS moved with commendable speed to carry out

the assessments of damage and to make the necessary payments. The

methodology and procedure adopted by the MoLSS were not unique.

They were within the normal remit of the MoLSS to assist persons who