Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  252 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 252 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

251

9.109.

With respect to the cage, Soldier #1 did not see a cage. He

“learnt” that there was a “cage” after he entered Tivoli. He described his

understanding of the cage thus:

“It was something to restrict the movement of persons. I

heard it was in the Java area.”

He did not know where the woman went but he saw her walk away. He heard

her say they were her sons.

9.110.

In response to questions from Mr. Terrence Williams of INDECOM,

Soldier #1 testified that, while he was at Dee Cee Avenue, he was not under fire.

He saw the woman as she passed him. Soldier #1 clarified a discrepancy in his

evidence as to the time when the killings took place. In oral evidence he had

said 1.30 p.m. However, his witness statement put the time approximately

between 4.00 and 5.00 p.m. He told the Commission “4.00 p.m. and 5.00 p.m.

is more correct”. Soldier #1 further said that he told a fellow soldier – “Ah pure

foolishness the police keep up!”

Soldier #3

9.111.

Soldier #3 was also part of the assault team. On 25 November

2014, he signed a written statement of what he had seen on 24 May 2010. He

supported the evidence of Soldier #1 as to the gunfire encountered on Industrial

Terrace and the breaching of a wall to gain entry into Tivoli Gardens.

9.112.

After entering Tivoli Gardens, Soldier #3 said he saw 3 police

officers in an armoured vehicle. Persons were detained and put in a confined

area in Java. It was not a physical “cage”. He said that a police officer left the

confined area and returned about 45 minutes later sometime between 2.00 p.m.

and 3.00 p.m.