Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  322 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 322 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

321

10.141.

The mortar had a range of about 3 miles, but “we chose to go

within 1000 metres of the furthest target and approximately 600 metres from the

Seprod perimeter fence and 800 metres from the area just South of the sports

complex. The Mortar Firers (Mortar Line) were South of Marcus Garvey Drive

near the old Sardine factory”.

Safety Procedures

10.142.

Maj. Dixon pointed out to the Commission that “the mortar is not a

pinpoint weapon system but it is designed to be fired within plus or minus 1

metre accuracy.” Accordingly, he had to take into account a number of factors

including the possibility of human error, the condition of equipment,

meteorological conditions, the nature of the ground where the mortar would land

and the time of flight of the round.

10.143.

When questioned about the distances within which the mortar

could be fired safely, Maj. Dixon mentioned the following:

The “predicted safety distance” was 550 metres from the

point of burst”; “operational safety distance” was 200

metres; “reduced safety distance” (i.e. the distance beyond

which one shrapnel from the round may travel) was 400

metres; “the danger zone” of a round was a radius of 90

metres, that is to say, a radius within which shrapnel may

cause injury; “the lethal area” was 40 metres.

He said that allowance had to be made for “bedding-in” when there could be

shifts in the baseline after the first round is fired.

10.144.

Maj. Dixon stated in oral evidence that he had no practical

experience of firing mortars in built-up areas and he agreed that shrapnel could

cause lethal injury and some types of mortar (but not the type used on 24 May)

could cause phosphorous burns. He did not agree that a human being could be

lifted off the ground as a result of an exploding mortar.