Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  441 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 441 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

440

“the venues of apparent crime scenes”. He said “I may well have indicated to

Mr. Gause that there were allegations of extra-judicial killings”.

14.12.

He also said –

“I would have expected crime scenes to have been

established by the JCF with alacrity. Not to have done so,

may have been a dereliction of duty.”

14.13.

No police officer who testified at the Enquiry gave any evidence

that crime scenes were established “with alacrity”. SSP Winchroy Budhoo said –

“Where bodies were located and notes made would have

been an indication of a possible crime scene. In a normal

operation, you would secure the scene and call the Scenes

of Crime officers to come and do their processing. This was

not a normal operation.”

Det. Insp. Devon Harris

14.14.

Det. Insp. Devon Harris was attached to Area 4 Scenes of Crime

Section in May 2010. His two witness statements are distinctly devoid of any

useful evidence as to why actual or potential crime scenes were not processed

speedily.

14.15.

Only during his oral evidence was Det. Insp. Harris more

forthcoming. Thus, he said –

“I was aware by 25 May of persons killed in Tivoli Gardens

either by the security forces or gunmen. In the normal

course of things, there would have been processing of

scenes. We were not required to process scenes but it is

important to do processing as soon as possible.”

14.16.

He further said –

“Up to 26 May, I was not told of any locations to be treated

as crime scenes. The BSI personnel did not know the

specific addresses of bodies. They did not know where they

were collected from…During the week of 24 May, it would

not have been safe to do scenes of crime processing. To