Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  473 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 473 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

472

14.142.

We also accept Mr. Campbell’s analysis of the post mortem

reports and his findings more particularly set out at para.14.63. To

that extent, we do not repeat his findings here.

14.143.

SSP Winchroy Budhoo’s evidence is worthless. His

credibility was destroyed by the several corrections he sought to make

to his witness statement and the reasons he gave for making the

corrections. We deprecate his corrections to his evidence after first

seeing Sgt. Waugh’s evidence on television and, secondly, in response

to a telephone conversation with Supt. Turner after Supt. Turner had

seen part of SSP Budhoo’s evidence on television. Such an approach to

sworn evidence does not only adversely affect the quality and

reliability of SSP Budhoo’s evidence. It is also unworthy of a senior

police officer of SSP Budhoo’s rank. Above all, it should never happen

at all.

14.144.

We have no similar concerns with the evidence of

Supt. Gladys Brown-Ellis. We endorse Mr. Witter’s observation that she

was very professional in extremely trying and traumatic circumstances.

Her evidence has been most useful to the Commission in our

determination of the actual number of persons killed as a result of the

internal security operation. We have determined that 69 persons died

as a result of the operation.

14.145.

With regard to the treatment of bodies, the evidence of

Mr. Ferdinand Madden was credible. His staff were confined to the

Funeral Home for 24 and 25 May as a consequence of the unstable

state of North Street. We applaud Mr. Madden’s prescience to request

the assistance of Taylor’s in storing bodies and we commend Mr. Taylor

for his response to a difficult situation. We accept the evidence of

Mr. Madden in respect of the treatment of decomposing bodies and we