Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

42

CDS Saunders, Lt. Col. Sewell and CoP Ellington. In his witness statement,

Lt. Col. Ogilvie said at para.9:

“Shortly before the New Year, I attended a meeting at HQ,

JDF which was jointly chaired by the Commissioner of Police

and the Deputy Chief of Defence Staff and including senior

officers of the JDF and JCF. No operational plans were

discussed but the meeting focused on guidance given by the

Chairmen concerning the planning, processes and conduct of

any operation to apprehend Mr. Coke.”

3.28.

Lt. Col. Ogilvie stated that among the issues discussed and the

guidance given –

“were the need to ensure that Mr. Coke’s rights were not

violated, the rights of citizens were to be protected and the

operation should consist of 3 phases – planning and

preparation, search and capture, and the return to normalcy,

the importance of examining past operations in Western

Kingston, the need for disciplined but overwhelming force

and the importance of the security forces having a positive

impact on communities.”

3.29.

Between March and May 2010, 1JR did contingency planning,

training and rehearsals. Emphasis was placed on the CDS’s instructions for

Opening Fire, Human Rights awareness, citizens’ rights and issues such as span

of control, de-confliction of unit boundaries, identification of friendly forces and

the interpretation of the Emergency Powers Regulations were discussed and

resolved.

FINDINGS

3.30.

We found rather disconcerting the evidence of

CDS Saunders and CoP Ellington that neither knew of the other’s plans,

namely, OPERATION KEYWEST and OPERATION GARDEN PARISH. We

do not believe that these were matters for secrecy at the highest level

of the security forces. In our view, to the extent that the operation