Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

43

was joint as between the two forces, the respective plans should have

been seen and discussed certainly at the level of the respective Heads.

3.31.

On the evidence adduced, we accept that senior officers of

both forces were involved in the planning of what was agreed to be a

joint operation. Deputy Commissioner Hinds, Lt. Col. Sewell and others

testified to their involvement in planning the joint operation.

Public Disquiet about The Hiatus

3.32.

The long hiatus between the request for Coke’s extradition and any

attempt to execute the warrant caused great public concern and disquiet. It is

said that “nature abhors a vacuum”. And, while the GoJ was exploring the

diplomatic, legal and Constitutional ramifications of the request, tension took

over the country – particularly in Kingston generally.

3.33.

In the month of May 2010, “there was an atmosphere of fear in the

country, especially the Corporate Area”, according to DCP Hinds. CDS Saunders

said that “these were anxious times for the Commissioner of Police and civil

society”.

18 MAY 2010 – SIGNING THE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED

3.34.

The Attorney-General informed the Prime Minister before 17 May

2010 that she intended to sign an order giving authority to proceed (ATP) with

the request of the USG. The Prime Minister decided to make a broadcast to the

nation. Mr. Golding, in answer to Lord Gifford, said –

“Cabinet was advised by the Attorney-General that she would

sign the Authority to Proceed. The effect of the Authority

was that a warrant would issue for Coke and be executed. I

did not consult with the Heads of the security forces about

the execution of the warrant. On that very day, I broadcast

to the nation and told them that the Minister would sign the

Authority to Proceed the next day. Coke would have been