Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  302 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 302 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

301

Re: Para.10.63 – Summary of Response by DSP Tabannah

10.81.

(i)

The records were handed over to police personnel at the

Command Post by Cons. Maxwell.

(ii)

When DSP Tabannah testified, he made it clear that the

records relating to the collection of bodies were never in his

possession.

(iii)

He was under no duty to retrieve or obtain records collated

by Cons. Maxwell.

(iv)

The Commission should have summoned the records and it

is strange that the JDF was not asked to produce records

concerning the handling of bodies.

Commission’s Comments and Findings

10.82.

If it is true that Cons. Maxwell’s notes were handed over to

personnel at the Command Post, it is indeed strange that they were not

located during the Enquiry or at any time before. ACP Gause testified

that he gave instructions to locate documentary evidence of where

bodies were found. But he told the Commission –

“For the 5 months, between May and October 2010, I

did not have any documentary evidence showing

where bodies were found, on what date or whether

anything illegal was found near the bodies.”

10.83.

And, as reported elsewhere in this Report, ACP Gause gave

evidence that the duty to insist that Cons. Maxwell’s notes be made

available to BSI as soon as possible after 24 May, “could very well be

the responsibility of Maxwell’s commanding officer, more so the SO

i/c.” In light of ACP Gause’s reference to “Commanding Officer”, it

seems to us that it was DCP Tabannah’s responsibility to recover

Cons. Maxwell’s notes.