Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  308 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 308 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

307

occurred. In the circumstances, the suggestion and imputation are

baseless and, indeed unfortunate and unbecoming of DSP Turner.

10.99.

There is no merit whatsoever in the allegation that the

tone of the Notice was “speculative” in that it sought “to malign” JCF

officers. The contents of the Notice faithfully followed the

requirements of the 2013 amendments to the Act. We append as

Appendix AC7C, a copy of the Notice sent to DSP Turner.

10.100.

We deprecate the reference to and identification of other

officers of the JCF who were not called as witnesses. Those persons

were available to be called by the JCF if it was considered that they

were in possession of important evidence. It was never represented to

the Commission that these persons be called as witnesses, even after

DSP Turner gave evidence and certain issues became live as a result

thereof.

10.101.

We also deprecate the accusations that we had any ulterior

motive in the text of the proposed adverse comments or at all. It is a

very tenuous response to level accusations of bias or improper motive

against the Commissioners.

10.102.

We make no comment on the specific observation

addressed to the Chairman that “the JCF were not the bad guys”. It is

a matter of regret that DSP Turner did not identify “the bad guys”

when he testified. It would have been of inestimable assistance to the

Commission.

10.103.

In all the circumstances, we stand by our original findings

in respect of DSP Turner.