340 / 494
339
Commission’s Comments and Findings
10.197.
We have commented on Capt. Crooks’ letters at para.9.83
above.
10.198.
Our understanding of Mr. Golding’s evidence is that he was
not aware of plans to use mortars in Tivoli Gardens. That was not a
matter that would normally be part of the remit of the Defence Board.
But he did receive reports of the use of mortars from residents who
referred to them as “bombs”. At the time of the reports, he made
inquiries of CDS Saunders. It is instructive to quote the precise words
of Mr. Golding:
“I think he (CDS Saunders) said these were not
incendiary devices; he said they have more bark than
bite; that they were used more for psychological
effect but they did not have the effect of mortar
artillery. That is what I understood from the CDS at
the time.”
10.199.
Mr. Golding could not recall the exact words of
CDS Saunders but he said that his “understanding from CDS Saunders
was that this was more a shock and awe effect that the military was
seeking to obtain. It was not something that would do mortar damage
but it would sound like a mortar. That is what he told me.”
10.200.
It is our finding, having regard to the evidence, that
CDS Saunders did not make it clear to Mr. Golding that mortars were
actually fired. He left the Prime Minister with the impression that the
weapon used would not have the effect of a mortar properly so called.