Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  488 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 488 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

487

15.30.

The most significant and worrying feature of our Enquiry was the

fact that the JCF did not acknowledge responsibility for any civilian deaths

whatsoever. The JDF, for its part, gave evidence of only one such death – a

sniper on the Blood Bank building. The time has surely come to usher in a

radical new culture in the operations of the security forces: a culture that

provides for greater transparency and accountability.

15.31.

Since 2005, police forces in many countries have introduced body-

worn video cameras to assist in capturing evidence in real time, to improve the

quality of evidence and to provide a mechanism for greater accountability by

members of police forces. The technology has been tried and tested. Rigorous

evaluations have found that body-worn cameras are effective in reducing

violence by police and complaints against the police. They protect both citizens

and police.

15.32.

This

recommendation

should also apply to soldiers who

participate in special policing operations. Most of all, they should be routinely

used in house clearing operations.

15.33.

We fully appreciate that the provision of such technology will be

costly but the use of the technology can be phased in according to the resources

available to the GoJ. We also appreciate that amendments to legislation will

necessarily be required. Nevertheless, we believe that the introduction of body

worn cameras must occur without undue delay.

We therefore recommend

the introduction of this type of technology.

4.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN JOINT OPERATIONS – A TRANSITION

COMMAND PROTOCOL

15.34.

We recommend

that the JDF and JCF fashion a transition

command protocol that would be applied in instances of large-scale joint internal