Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  361 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 361 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

360

10.266.

Having regard to the foregoing, we find that the detentions

of the witnesses who testified were illegal as being contrary to the

Regulations and were also unconstitutional.

10.267.

We find that the complaints of residents that they were

made to sit in water or kneel on gravel were truthful. Such conduct on

the part of the security forces was in breach of section 17(1) of the

Constitution and amounted to degrading treatment within the meaning

of that section.

Adverse Comments re: Maj. Marlon Kennedy

10.268.

On 13 April 2016, the Commission referred a draft of para.10.262

(formerly 10.185) to Maj. Marlon Kennedy as a “proposed adverse finding” and

sought his response thereto. He replied on 5 May 2016 through Counsel and his

response is appended to this Report at Appendix AC9.

Re: Para.10.262 (formerly 10.185)- Summary of Response

10.269.

(i)

Maj. Kennedy’s decision to take persons into custody must

be assessed according to principles of proportionality and

the prevailing circumstances.

(ii)

Maj. Kennedy did not act arbitrarily but with reasonable and

probable cause.

(iii)

In the circumstances, he had a duty to secure his sector and

that entailed restraining and controlling all persons found in

the area until their credentials could be established.

(iv)

Lt. Col. Ogilvie testified that he came across several persons

who were not from West Kingston and he observed young

men in the community unknown to them.