Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  371 / 494 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 371 / 494 Next Page
Page Background

370

“You have an operation which is guided by an Operational

Order and it is a pre-planned operation, meaning that you

have time to assess risks, plan, allocate responsibilities,

resource them and set up structures to monitor the

execution, but this one had the Commissioner and the

Deputy and their staff at gold. It had Silver Commanders

who were responsible for things like cordons.”

11.30.

For the operation, the JCF established three levels of command,

viz. Gold, Silver and Bronze. CoP Ellington and DCP Hinds were the Gold

Commanders along with CDS Saunders of the JDF. CoP Ellington’s oral evidence

on 14 April 2015 is instructive as to the levels of command below himself and

DCP Hinds. He said –

“We had two Silver commanders. One in charge of cordon

and support, and the other one who is in charge of arrests,

searches and evidence gathering. Naturally, the officer in

charge of cordon and support would be deployed first

because that is to secure the target and the officer in charge

of arrests, searches and evidence gathering would stage

their deployment as it is possible thereafter. Below Silver,

you have what we call Bronze commanders. These are

usually lower ranking Gazetted Officers and may even be

Inspectors who are assigned to perform some specific roles

within the operation such as establishing [cordons]. And

then you may have officers who are responsible for inner

cordons which are where you go closer to the target. Then

you may have our arrest team and you may have an

extraction team there for injured or high value

targets…..each headed by a Bronze commander.”

11.31.

The situational structure and related responsibilities were informed

by what CoP Ellington and ACP Blake described as the IRIMAC model. Broadly,

IRIMAC is an acronym that highlights the critical elements of good operational

planning and the assignment of responsibilities. It therefore provides for:

INFORMATION/INTELLIGENCE

RISK assessment e.g. safety of officers and the public

INTENTION e.g. effecting the arrest of Coke

METHOD e.g. the manner of achieving the objective